Eastern Kentucky
Men - Women
2016 - 2017 - 2018
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
23  Charlotte Imer JR 19:27
118  Luisa Boschan SR 20:01
252  Lilian Kiborus SO 20:24
357  Ciara Scott SR 20:37
420  Haley Yost SR 20:43
517  Gladys Cheruiyot JR 20:52
824  Meggan Grams JR 21:17
1,168  Leah Polycarpou JR 21:39
1,773  Katherine Grasberger SR 22:18
2,887  Haley Holbrook FR 24:11
National Rank #29 of 348
Southeast Region Rank #5 of 50
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 50.1%
Most Likely Finish 26th at Nationals


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.9%
Top 20 at Nationals 15.6%


Regional Champion 0.5%
Top 5 in Regional 67.7%
Top 10 in Regional 99.9%
Top 20 in Regional 100.0%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Charlotte Imer Luisa Boschan Lilian Kiborus Ciara Scott Haley Yost Gladys Cheruiyot Meggan Grams Leah Polycarpou Katherine Grasberger Haley Holbrook
Kentucky Bluegrass Invitational 09/09 732 19:41 20:33 20:28 20:44 20:51 21:51 21:22 21:55
Louisville Classic (Gold) 09/30 648 19:25 20:27 20:29 20:27 20:46 21:03 21:23 22:05 22:23
Pre-Nationals (Black) 10/14 21:47 22:16
Pre-Nationals (Red) 10/14 462 19:08 19:58 20:09 20:23 20:30 21:02 21:40
Ohio Valley Championship 10/28 817 20:05 20:39 20:43 20:45 20:47 20:58 20:56 21:35 22:10 24:12
Southeast Region Championships 11/10 477 19:13 19:37 20:17 20:36 20:44 20:26 20:55





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 50.1% 22.6 547 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.3 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.9 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.9 4.0 3.7 2.9 4.1 4.3 3.5 3.8 2.5 2.1 1.0
Region Championship 100% 4.8 164 0.5 6.2 19.7 20.8 20.6 16.2 9.1 4.0 2.6 0.5 0.1 0.1



Individual Results

NCAA ChampionshipAdvances to RoundAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Charlotte Imer 99.9% 29.9 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.7 1.8 1.7 2.0 1.8 2.0 1.7 2.6 2.0 2.8 2.2 1.8 1.9 2.0 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.1 2.2
Luisa Boschan 51.0% 100.5 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2
Lilian Kiborus 50.1% 163.1
Ciara Scott 50.1% 195.0
Haley Yost 50.1% 204.6
Gladys Cheruiyot 50.1% 220.3
Meggan Grams 50.2% 242.0


RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Charlotte Imer 4.8 11.4 12.0 10.0 9.8 8.9 8.8 6.9 6.7 4.9 5.2 4.5 3.1 2.2 1.7 1.6 0.7 0.9 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.1
Luisa Boschan 18.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.2 1.4 1.7 3.3 3.5 4.9 4.4 5.4 4.7 5.9 5.0 5.3 5.6 5.4 4.3 4.3 4.0 4.1 3.5
Lilian Kiborus 34.8 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.8 0.9 1.5 1.6 1.1 1.8 2.6 3.5 2.9 2.5
Ciara Scott 48.4 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.8 0.8 0.7
Haley Yost 54.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.5 0.2
Gladys Cheruiyot 64.8 0.1 0.1 0.1
Meggan Grams 97.6




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 0.5% 100.0% 0.5 0.5 1
2 6.2% 100.0% 6.2 6.2 2
3 19.7% 75.8% 0.3 0.5 0.4 0.8 1.5 2.3 2.4 2.0 1.7 0.7 0.8 0.4 1.3 4.8 14.9 3
4 20.8% 68.3% 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.1 1.6 2.7 2.7 1.6 1.3 1.2 0.9 0.7 6.6 14.2 4
5 20.6% 40.9% 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.3 0.6 0.8 1.8 1.2 1.4 1.0 0.7 12.2 8.4 5
6 16.2% 28.7% 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 1.4 0.8 0.9 0.9 11.6 4.7 6
7 9.1% 10.5% 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 8.1 1.0 7
8 4.0% 7.6% 0.1 0.1 0.1 3.7 0.3 8
9 2.6% 2.0% 0.1 2.5 0.1 9
10 0.5% 0.5 10
11 0.1% 0.1 11
12 0.1% 0.1 12
13 13
14 14
15 15
16 16
17 17
18 18
19 19
20 20
21 21
22 22
23 23
24 24
25 25
26 26
27 27
28 28
29 29
30 30
31 31
32 32
33 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
48 48
49 49
50 50
Total 100% 50.1% 0.5 6.2 0.3 0.6 0.7 1.4 3.1 4.2 5.7 5.7 5.7 4.7 4.5 3.4 3.8 49.9 6.7 43.5




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Mississippi 97.2% 1.0 1.0
Texas 58.3% 1.0 0.6
Ohio State 37.3% 1.0 0.4
Louisville 33.4% 2.0 0.7
Virginia Tech 27.9% 2.0 0.6
SMU 20.8% 1.0 0.2
Northern Arizona 17.7% 1.0 0.2
Samford 10.8% 1.0 0.1
Missouri 5.0% 1.0 0.1
Duke 4.9% 1.0 0.0
Arizona 2.8% 1.0 0.0
Wake Forest 2.5% 1.0 0.0
Abilene Christian 1.6% 1.0 0.0
West Virginia 0.8% 1.0 0.0
Northwestern 0.7% 1.0 0.0
Portland 0.6% 1.0 0.0
Vanderbilt 0.5% 1.0 0.0
Brown 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Auburn 0.4% 1.0 0.0
Pittsburgh 0.2% 1.0 0.0
Arizona State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Kentucky 0.1% 2.0 0.0
Dayton 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Total 3.8
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 10.0